2 ms·

I would assume that it would basically wipe out most of the life in the sea. But of course, we don't need fish to live. I'd rather keep 'em though, personally.

• d0mine 16y ago
  No plankton means no oxygen planet-wise (forests provide zero or negative oxygen yield) as far as I know.
  • iwwr 16y ago
    "forests provide zero or negative oxygen yield" Do you know of a resource you can point to about that topic?
    • d0mine 16y ago
      No, a quick google search shows that most resources think that 20-70% of the world's atmospheric oxygen comes from trees.