4 ms·
In this case, one side is citing at least one source from a world reknowned organization that is respected to actually know what health is. The other side has
by SolaceQuantum 7y ago
In this case, one side is citing at least one source from a world reknowned organization that is respected to actually know what health is.
The other side has no sources provided whatsoever.
- sridca 7y agoYou won't get to facts via appealing to authority. WHO has been wrong for example in regards to meat and cancer: http://www.diagnosisdiet.com/meat-and-cancer/ http://www.diagnosisdiet.com/meat-and-cancer/ When you get right down to it, the only plausible evidence to suggest that red meat might be risky to human colon health is contained in two, that’s TWO, human studies, both of which were very small and poorly designed, and therefore unable to give us useful information about the effects of red meat on cancer risk. These studies are inconclusive at best, and worthless at worst.
- Japhy_Ryder 7y ago“Diagnosis Diet” is being cited as an authority over the WHO? Are you serious?
- sridca 7y agoThe appeal to authority on this one is pathetically strong.