4 ms·
This wont change a thing. Regardless who her successor is, be it a brexiteer or a remainer, the country, and the house is split on what to do about Brexit. The
by Jaruzel 7y ago
This wont change a thing. Regardless who her successor is, be it a brexiteer or a remainer, the country, and the house is split on what to do about Brexit.
The next PM will try to bring yet another withdrawal agreement to the house, and for all the same reasons it'll get rejected.
The only upside that may come out of this, is that we'll get another vote about leaving. Then one way or another everyone will be forced to agree about what to do next.
- vertline3 7y agoWell they had a vote already, so then with a do over precedent, do officials just keep asking for do overs until they get the desired results? It's messy.
- mrguyorama 7y agoIf the "people" do not "accept" the result of the previous vote, but are more accepting of the results of the new vote, there's nothing wrong with it. That's kind of how democracy works. It may feel wrong, but if the people's opinion change, then so can the result
- vertline3 7y agoAnd if the second vote fails, do you have a third and a fourth vote? Until the outcome is desired?
- miemo 7y agoif you agreed to get ice-cream next year, then become lactose-intolerant, do you refuse to reconsider?
- vertline3 7y agoNot the same issue really. Political stunts can cause damage. I call it a stunt because it was never meant to pass, but it did...
- mrguyorama 7y agoI think it is more important that the second vote could be more definitive. Hopefully it would split more than 2% one way or the other this time. And indeed, if it once again goes leave, then I think it's reasonable for the UK to leave basically right away, no plan or anything. It's only right
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]