4 ms·
OK, I guess from the massive down-voting that this summary is inaccurate, or misleading, or inflammatory, or something. That's close to no information at all.
by loup-vaillant 16y ago
OK, I guess from the massive down-voting that this summary is inaccurate, or misleading, or inflammatory, or something.
That's close to no information at all. So if someone could make a better summary, or at least a teaser, please do so.
- hugh3 16y agoI think "tl;dr"s always get downmodded to oblivion.
- loup-vaillant 16y agoYet summaries without that term often sky-rocket: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2002255 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2002255 And more than one HNer publicly stated that they read comments first, to see if the article is worth their time. This only make sense if "tl;dr" is considered as a swear word here at HN. Is it?