3 ms·

> maybe, just maybe, we won't see "new"s or "delete"s in most future codebases? I haven't seen 'new' or 'delete' in the wild for a decade now. (Well, except f

> maybe, just maybe, we won't see "new"s or "delete"s in most future codebases? I haven't seen 'new' or 'delete' in the wild for a decade now. (Well, except for various legacy libraries or student code on Github.)

geezerjay 7y ago
Qt code uses 'new' extensively because Qt components take ownership of components and manage memory allocation automatically.
- hellofunk 7y ago
  What you describe is still common practice in the language, but the mechanisms no longer use a new or delete to achieve that.
roel_v 7y ago
Me too. I've been writing pretty much only C++ for 20 years, and if I'd go back and count, I think I'd have maybe a dozen times where I used new/delete, none of those in the last 10 years. Like all languages that are actually used, there is much one can complain about in C++, but claiming that one needs a lot of manual memory management is done mostly by people who haven't written much if any C++.
- emsy 7y ago
  Or people who care about heap fragmentation and cache misses.
  - roel_v 7y ago
    Sure, but those people don't want GC either. Not to say that all languages that are not C++ are garbage collected, but the people who complain about manual memory mgmt are not the ones who care about those things.