4 ms·
That's an interesting claim. I have to say it doesn't match my experience at all, e.g. when playing VP9 videos on Youtube. Several thoughts: * I'm not sure wh
by bscphil 7y ago
That's an interesting claim. I have to say it doesn't match my experience at all, e.g. when playing VP9 videos on Youtube. Several thoughts:
* I'm not sure what the "ffh264" decoder they're talking about is. My understanding is that pretty much everyone is using libx264 for both encoding and decoding. Maybe the latter is more performant?
* Using SSIM to pick "equal quality" files will probably not give very accurate results.
* SVT-VP9 is, if I'm not mistaken, a hardware encoder. One of the issues with these is that they require some significant tradeoffs to get better speed, so they'll have worse quality than a software encoder at the same bitrate. If you go with software you really pay the price when it comes to encoding time.
- cornstalks 7y agoSome corrections: ffh264 is FFmpeg's decoder. libx264 only does encoding, not decoding. SVT-VP9 is a software encoder, specially optimized for Intel Xeon Scalable and Intel Xeon D processors.
- pg_is_a_butt 7y agoDoes it use speculative execution to make those gains?
- ryantriangles 7y agolibx264 isn't used as a decoder, it only encodes.