3 ms·
Not necessarily, I would consider an interpreter as something entirely different because there is no requirement that it abide to the syntax of the language. I
by blackflame7000 7y ago
Not necessarily, I would consider an interpreter as something entirely different because there is no requirement that it abide to the syntax of the language. I feel that syntax defines the language just like spoken language. It doesn’t make sense to me to say this language english is implemented in Spanish and German.
- boomlinde 7y ago> Not necessarily, I would consider an interpreter as something entirely different because there is no requirement that it abide to the syntax of the language. What does this mean? A language interpreter naturally abides to the syntax of the language it implements. > It doesn’t make sense to me to say this language english is implemented in Spanish and German. Maybe because natural languages are a useless analogy for this in the first place.
- voldacar 7y agoa cpu is a microcode interpreter