5 ms·
Well, perhaps they should upgrade it for the sake of the ~170 CVEs that have been published against Java 1.8.0_60? https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list
by jmgrosen 7y ago
Well, perhaps they should upgrade it for the sake of the ~170 CVEs that have been published against Java 1.8.0_60? https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list.php?vendor_id=93&product_id=19116&version_id=&page=4&hasexp=0&opdos=0&opec=0&opov=0&opcsrf=0&opgpriv=0&opsqli=0&opxss=0&opdirt=0&opmemc=0&ophttprs=0&opbyp=0&opfileinc=0&opginf=0&cvssscoremin=0&cvssscoremax=0&year=0&month=0&cweid=0&order=1&trc=597&sha=52d5e2189c154fbfa1e3d4ba0a13fc6b00642bc4 https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list.php?vendor_id=...
Sure, a lot of those probably don't apply to how they're using Java, but I'd bet at least a couple do.