You’re so confused. > FLAC has no benefit over traditional 16/24 encoded content Yes it does. It’s anywhere from 70-30% the size depending on genre. That’s a

You’re so confused. > FLAC has no benefit over traditional 16/24 encoded content Yes it does. It’s anywhere from 70-30% the size depending on genre. That’s a benefit. > you might think that FLAC/lossless is audibly better. No I think and expect it to sound audibly identical. That’s the whole point.