3 ms·
Which is irrelevant, because they'd manufacture some other charge to get him on. Every single person on the entire planet can be charged with dozens of things
by username444 7y ago
Which is irrelevant, because they'd manufacture some other charge to get him on.
Every single person on the entire planet can be charged with dozens of things by a u.s. prosecutor with enough time and incentive. That's how the laws are designed. If they want you, they _will_ get you.
- duxup 7y ago>Which is irrelevant, Facts are irrelivant... > because they'd manufacture some other charge to get him on. Because of things that aren't facts? I don't know what to tell you other than with that pattern it seems like you could belive in lizard people or something.
- mcv 7y agoBut those are not things that Sweden would extradite him for. They'd lock him up for rape, yes, but not extradite him to the US.
- username444 7y agoMail fraud, wire fraud, intellectual property theft, copyright infringement/piracy, subpeonas, a law from 1806 about people with white hair, i-dont-like-your-face, etc. My point isn't so much that this one specific violation wouldn't qualify for extradition. It's that the laws are so intentionally vague and broad and numerous that they can be interpreted in such a way to charge _anybody_ with _something_ if they want to.