4 ms·
I don’t really worry about this kinda thing. A display has several GB/s of information displayed. Microphones don’t have nearly that much bandwidth. (This is wh
by d-sc 7y ago
I don’t really worry about this kinda thing. A display has several GB/s of information displayed. Microphones don’t have nearly that much bandwidth. (This is why headphone cables don’t change much and Bluetooth audio is easy but video cables get updated every year with increasing display resolutions and wireless video is not as common).
For this to reliably work, they would effectively be compressing information out of the display signal.
In their paper they mentioned having to use size 175 font to distinguish between sets of letters typed on the screen. Which is cool, but pretty esoteric in my opinion.
- p1necone 7y agoA display has the capability to display several GB/s of information. But for the most part it's displaying a lot of static images and duplicate frames (unless you're watching video or playing games). I don't think it's mathematically impossible to read smaller fonts if the same static window is on the screen for enough frames.