A big point that the article doesn't bring up is the ongoing upkeep costs that already exist even for smaller organizations. Even if the computers are all runn

A big point that the article doesn't bring up is the ongoing upkeep costs that already exist even for smaller organizations. Even if the computers are all running windows 2000, the easiest way for most companies to license the software is by paying a yearly site licence to Microsoft. If Chrome OS costs less than than that yearly upkeep cost, and comes with perks of low maintenance and remote connectivity, I could see a lot of companies being very tempted to switch.