> When non-profits succeed they have to ask for more money. When for-profits succeed, they fund themselves. Having managed a non-profit and having worked at a

> When non-profits succeed they have to ask for more money. When for-profits succeed, they fund themselves. Having managed a non-profit and having worked at a very successful one before, this just makes you sound so out-of-touch it's not even funny. Yes, some non-profits are driven by donations, but many are not. > So it's far better for a for-profit to solve a given problem than a non-profit, as they are inherently more scalable. If by, "more scalable," you mean, "less accountable," then you're correct.