Hmm; I don't want to say "It's you..." ;), but the Fujifilm X mount is one of the most developed of the "new" mounts: http://www.sansmirror.com/lenses/lens-data

Hmm; I don't want to say "It's you..." ;), but the Fujifilm X mount is one of the most developed of the "new" mounts: http://www.sansmirror.com/lenses/lens-database/lenses-from-camera-makers/fujifilm-xf-mount-lenses/ http://www.sansmirror.com/lenses/lens-database/lenses-from-c... In particular, the zooms: https://www.fujifilm.com/products/digital_cameras/x/index.html#zoomlens https://www.fujifilm.com/products/digital_cameras/x/index.ht... Now, it IS expensive, on average. But by all accounts their lenses are mostly worth the price. And 300 for a prime is largely normal. In all mounts, lens price is variable but high when you get to even remotely non-junk stuff. In my world of Nikkors for example, the Nikon 85mm 1.8g is widely considered a "bargain", at average price of $500 (compared to the $1,500 1.4G version). I own the $100 "nifty fifty" and the $2000 70-200mm 2.8, and that's all prosumer country. Functional exotics can be $5000-$8000 for working pros (not Leica luxury items;).