2 ms·

Again, why shouldn't they? 2.5 children is a perfectly acceptable number. Also, the birthrate in the USA (and most Western world) is already below the replacem

by wtdata 7y ago

Again, why shouldn't they? 2.5 children is a perfectly acceptable number. Also, the birthrate in the USA (and most Western world) is already below the replacement rate for decades now. [1] [1] https://www.iheart.com/content/2019-05-15-birth-rate-in-united-states-hits-32-year-low-new-report-says/ https://www.iheart.com/content/2019-05-15-birth-rate-in-unit... EDIT: Sorry, I wasn't understanding your point that families can't afford to have as many kids as they could one generation ago. I agree with you.

tveita 7y ago
The poster is shocked because people's (self-estimated) ability to afford kids has gone down, leading to a larger number of people who want kids to stay childless. They are not saying that people wanting kids is a bad thing. Many people assume that people have less kids because preferences and lifestyles have changed, leading to headlines like, "Millennials don't want kids" (And maybe in the same vein, "Millennials are killing cars", "Millennials want smaller homes", etc.)