5 ms·
Is there something we can do to the title to distinguish the Coldfusion language with nuclear cold fusion? The title seems applicable to both and even the first
by pwnna 7y ago
Is there something we can do to the title to distinguish the Coldfusion language with nuclear cold fusion? The title seems applicable to both and even the first paragraph could be misleading if you assumed the latter.
- torkable 7y agowell one is real and the other is not so you could start there lmfao
- DtnB 7y agonot to be glib but the fact that its Capitalized and one word rather than 'cold fusion', should be enough no?
- collyw 7y agoIsn't it obvious from the context in this case? (Why would nuclear cold fusion be unpopular?) Admittedly younger devs may never have heard of the language. I have never seen examples of it in the wild, but I remember one of my university lectures talking about how good it was for a balance of usability and scale-ability - back in 2000.
- bdcravens 7y agoOn a forum dedicated principally to programming I assume languages, the same way I assume the same when talking about Ruby and Python. (Instead of gemstones and snakes)
- sergj 7y agoI was also confused. I thought this article was about how the cold fusion hobbyist movement is dying down because the topic is becoming unpopular. Fusion and cold fusion are discussed from time to time here, so it is not super obvious.
- wmblaettler 7y agoPerhaps proper spelling/casing: ColdFusion. Though the title here mirrors the article's title.
- mhd 7y agoHuh, is cold fusion still a thing? I thought it went the way of the bussard ramjet.