3 ms·
OK, fine. Then use std::string_view, etc., which are cleaner and more efficient usually. There are several reasons why C++ open source is hard to reuse, and not
by humanrebar 7y ago
OK, fine. Then use std::string_view, etc., which are cleaner and more efficient usually. There are several reasons why C++ open source is hard to reuse, and not using standard types appropriately is one of them.
- akling 7y agoThis entire project is about implementing already-existing functionality in its own way, with minimal dependencies, for fun. Its use of the C++ language strives to be modern. There is no attempt to use modern 3rd-party C++ frameworks.
- Crinus 7y agoI just wrote that the API is garbage and then you recommend me to use the API? :-P The entire STL/StdC++ has the same design style, it is garbage all the way down. I'd rather use something like Qt (which is far from great, but better than STL/StdC++). Well, personally i'd rather not use C++ in the first place, but if i'm going to use C++ i'd rather use something else (which frankly, would be my own container and string classes that provide a much better API).