3 ms·
I agree. All the recent additions to Github are superficially very nice and convenient features (Actions, package registry, Sponsors, Dependabot). But they re
by the_duke 7y ago
I agree.
All the recent additions to Github are superficially very nice and convenient features (Actions, package registry, Sponsors, Dependabot).
But they represent a very significant change in mindset.
Github is turning from a neutral code hosting platform with a myriad of equally empowered third party integrations into the direction of a "all in one" dev tool and platform.
I understand the internal pressures to do this: increased popularity, added value proposition for customers, more revenue.
But: all the built-in tools will have an inherent advantage over third party solutions.
This also inevitably leads to increased lock-in and homogenization.
I was very critical of the Microsoft acquisition for similar reasons, and considering the monumental role Github represents for open source today, I am very sceptical of the way things are going.
We might very well regret centralizing everything open source around Github in a few years.
- Kye 7y agoI wrote something about the pattern of centralization/decentralization in the context of Patreon: https://kyefox.com/patreons-future-venture-capital-is-bad-and-destinations-become-dead-ends/ https://kyefox.com/patreons-future-venture-capital-is-bad-an... GitHub is somewhere between 2 and 3 right now.