3 ms·
I am astounded that after all this time it is still 0.y.z I mean, it has been around for like 5+ years... I am even more astounded that people are happy to us
by rurounijones 7y ago
I am astounded that after all this time it is still 0.y.z
I mean, it has been around for like 5+ years...
I am even more astounded that people are happy to use a product that by its own definition is not stable.
Same happen in ruby a lot. You find a Gem that claims to follow semantic versioning and it is still in 0.y.z after years of being used in production which flies in the face of https://semver.org/#how-do-i-know-when-to-release-100 https://semver.org/#how-do-i-know-when-to-release-100
- hedwall 7y agoWhere does Terraform claim to follow semver?
- IloveHN84 7y agoWhere doesn't it claim it? Using a versioning scheme like x.y.z _by default_ means semver
- NikolaeVarius 7y agoNo it doesn't. Why would you think it does?
- rurounijones 7y agoI never said it did. I said rubygems did and often fail at following that. However I know of no common versioning scheme where 0.y.z is considered production ready.
- IloveHN84 7y agoWell we can argue about the hundreds of Apache projects that are not even stable after decades. OpenSource projects have another pace compared to commercial solutions