3 ms·
> But, after the initial pain of the 2.7->3.0 transition, I doubt we'll ever see another major version number jump, even if a logical use of version numbers wou
by anoncake 7y ago
> But, after the initial pain of the 2.7->3.0 transition, I doubt we'll ever see another major version number jump, even if a logical use of version numbers would merit it.
Do you think the transition would have been less painful if 3.0 had been called 2.8?
- dagw 7y agoIf Python 2.8 had come out and failed to run almost all code written for Python 2.7 then that probably would have been truly disastrous for the language.