4 ms·
https://encrypted.google.com/search?hl=en&tbs=rl%3A1&q=site%3Areddit.com https://encrypted.google.com/search?hl=en&tbs=rl%3A1&... and https://encrypted.goo
by Mithrandir 16y ago
https://encrypted.google.com/search?hl=en&tbs=rl%3A1&q=site%3Areddit.com https://encrypted.google.com/search?hl=en&tbs=rl%3A1&...
and
https://encrypted.google.com/search?hl=en&tbs=rl%3A1&q=site%3Aen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2F https://encrypted.google.com/search?hl=en&tbs=rl%3A1&...
- quizbiz 16y ago^ is comparing Reddit with Wikipedia. Results are not shocking.
- dantle 16y agohttps://encrypted.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&tbs=rl%3A1&q=site%3Asimple.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2F& https://encrypted.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&t...; So much for Simple English wikipedia!
- G_Wen 16y agoInteresting, perhaps in their effort to avoid short scientific terms they have substituted in longer more common words. For example describing a tumor as "an abnormal new mass of tissue that serves no purpose". http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=tumor http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=tumor The seemingly paradoxical result in an increase in understandability but a decrease in usability. Think of it as reading a passage where almost every noun has been substituted by a dictionary definition.