3 ms·

Dr Oz[1]? That quack? Please. He's an astrologer not a doctor. 1: https://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2018/06/07/a-new-low-for-dr-oz https://blogs.s

• heybrendan 7y ago
  The transcript (and linked video) is only Peterson speaking. Your feelings regarding Oz and any associated controversy are irrelevant, unless you're indirectly implying that Oz is unfit to conduct an interview, in which case, I think you've got your work cut out for you. It would be impertinent and premature to dismiss an interview simply because you dislike the host: I can easily name any number of hosts I dislike or have a general disdain for yet found the discussions interesting and/or thought-provoking. That being said, if it's not crystal-clear at this point: it's discussion around Peterson's ideas I'm interested in, in the context of China (and the TFA). Would you care to respond to Peterson's thoughts directly?