5 ms·
Looks a lot like Linux with a fvwm95 interface on top. I mean, it's always great and so exciting to see something totally new being created from scratch! But
by 0815test 7y ago
Looks a lot like Linux with a fvwm95 interface on top. I mean, it's always great and so exciting to see something totally new being created from scratch! But you don't actually need to switch to some entirely homegrown, untested kernel for that 1990s UI fix! ;-)
- coldacid 7y agoOne could always also throw together a virtual machine for running Windows 3.1 like I keep doing.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- Jaruzel 7y agoFor most non-technical people, a Windows 3.1 type GUI is all they need.
- Crinus 7y agoUntil they maximize one of the program group windows and suddenly "where are all my programs?" :-P
- AnIdiotOnTheNet 7y agoStop this. It's condescending and part of the reason no one like tech people. It's also one of the core reasons the Linux Desktop never took off: "you don't need that, you just need (simple usecase that I envisioned because it was easy)."
- Jaruzel 7y agoReally? I'd argue that Android and iOS have proven that the simpler the GUI, the easier it is for the masses to use them. Imagine if working a car was as complicated as your average desktop OS. There would be a lot less people driving that's for sure.
- IggleSniggle 7y agoA lot less people driving, but the people who did drive would have a higher chance of being able to repair them without going to a specialist.
- pjmlp 7y agoI would rather use the original fvwm actually. :)