> The idealistic argument would be that moving to IT and algorithms reduces the gross amount of human bias that currently enters into the system. That is not m

> The idealistic argument would be that moving to IT and algorithms reduces the gross amount of human bias that currently enters into the system. That is not my argument. I am merely saying that I don't think facial recognition is going to present problems that outweigh its value as a law enforcement tool. There will no doubt be some abuses, just as there is of any new technology. I support regulation and intense scrutiny of how law enforcement uses these tools, to minimize the severity and duration of these abuses. But I don't think that means it's a good idea that Amazon's board should have to approve each entity attempting to use their services individually.