4 ms·
I think a valid definition of functional would be 'common in everyday life', and 'powerlifter trying to max his/her squat' does not qualify as a common everyday
by foldingmoney 7y ago
I think a valid definition of functional would be 'common in everyday life', and 'powerlifter trying to max his/her squat' does not qualify as a common everyday movement.
Parent might be referring to the assertion that the abs' main role is to prevent torso flexion (as opposed to cause it), which makes something like a Paloff press a more 'functional' movement.
- Mirioron 7y agoBut if said muscle was used in everyday life, then wouldn't it already be strong enough?
- sn9 7y agoNot necessarily. The demands of everyday life are sufficient to keep you strong enough for those activities. Strength training helps with you meet the demands of the things that happen irregularly like moving furniture, clearing snow, having to take care of an injured spouse or parent, or even just playing the odd game of [sport-of-your-own-choosing]. It counters the atrophy associated with a sedentary lifestyle and delays the physical decay associated with old age and adds life to your years. It strengthens bones and improves body composition. It makes everyday life easier and would be worth of billions of dollars if its benefits could be captured in a pill.