2 ms·
No, I too believe language can evolve. I too believe there exist many other definition of violence that even more absurd. There still million of people that us
by matz1 7y ago
No, I too believe language can evolve. I too believe
there exist many other definition of violence that even more absurd.
There still million of people that use the term violence like mine, it is still a valid use, even if you do find it challenging.
- KirinDave 7y agoI agree that there are an awful lot of people who'd like to put forth your point as a means to defend their actions. And like them, you're the one seeking to erase senses from the dictionary by pretending they aren't there to begin with.
- matz1 7y agoYes, I too agree that there are an awful lot of people to put forth your point as a means to defend their actions. And like them, you're the one who contribute the support to replace the current definition.
- KirinDave 7y agoIt's pretty amazing how you started out arguing for the dictionary definition, suggesting that's how we know common usage. But here we are with you, days later, still completely unable to incorporate that fact into your worldview. Still insisting that your desire to erase the other senses of "violence" is somehow the status quo. The one who wants to erase bits that have been in the dictionary for decades and ignore the real world use of many senses of violence just to protect your political beliefs? In this thread: it's you
- matz1 7y agoAnd who want to promote expanded definition of violence to benefit your political beliefs and reject other usage of it : its you