> In a world where you can watch practically anything whenever you want, dominance in distribution is very fragile. That sounds exactly like the arguments agai

> In a world where you can watch practically anything whenever you want, dominance in distribution is very fragile. That sounds exactly like the arguments against Uber to me: that these companies indeed have changed our day-to-day lives, but their innovations are in no way exclusive and users will easily switch between providers, quickly reacting to changes in quality of service (ride cost for Uber and Office and Friends being on Netflix).