3 ms·
Because you can put the energy required to level a city in the back of a pickup truck, then level a city with it using the same technology has a hypothetical fu
by scottlocklin 7y ago
Because you can put the energy required to level a city in the back of a pickup truck, then level a city with it using the same technology has a hypothetical fusion reactor possible, that's why. I don't know why you can't see the destructive potential of a project Daedelus with the business end aimed at Los Angeles.
The NIF result created 35000 neutrons, and you should know that press release is the functional definition of a scientific fraud -I wrote a couple of articles on it which you can go find if you care about fraud.
- pdonis 7y ago> Because you can put the energy required to level a city in the back of a pickup truck Yes, we can already do this, it's called a fusion bomb. > then level a city with it using the same technology has a hypothetical fusion reactor possible No, a bomb is not the same as a fusion reactor. A bomb burns a megaton of TNT's worth of fusion fuel all at once. A fusion reactor outputting a gigawatt of power burns the same amount of fuel in about a year. It's not at all the same thing.
- pdonis 7y ago> that press release is the functional definition of a scientific fraud -I wrote a couple of articles on it Google isn't showing me anything useful. Do you have links?
- pdonis 7y ago> a project Daedelus with the business end aimed at Los Angeles So basically you're talking about a fusion-powered one-gigawatt flamethrower?