3 ms·
>Giving hormones to tweens for the sake of a rounding error of the population There are any number of medical disorders that affect only "a rounding error of t
by jdietrich 7y ago
>Giving hormones to tweens for the sake of a rounding error of the population
There are any number of medical disorders that affect only "a rounding error of the population". Medically-assisted transition with hormone treatment for gender dysphoria is the treatment option best supported by the evidence, although the quality of evidence is currently less than ideal.
If you have found peer-reviewed research indicating that hormone treatment for GD does more harm than good, I'd be eager to see it.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4977075/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4977075/
- antt 7y ago>If you have found peer-reviewed research indicating that hormone treatment for GD does more harm than good, I'd be eager to see it. Somewhat difficult when leading researchers are the targets of mobs and death threats [0], banned from the public square [1], and denied funding and tenure [2]. In conditions such as these that the science isn't 100% unanimous means that in saner times the consensus will be completely the opposite of what special interests are pushing for, see tobacco-cancer, co2-global warming for the playbook. Or are you going to try wiggle out of this with whataboutism on how unjust things used to be 40 years ago? [0] https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/08/04/woman-2 https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/08/04/woman-2 [1] https://twitter.com/BlanchardPhD/status/1127957512240672768 https://twitter.com/BlanchardPhD/status/1127957512240672768 [2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AInfL9PiGHI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AInfL9PiGHI
- jdietrich 7y agoYour entire comment is a non-sequitur. Your first link is about a conference organised by radical feminists, none of whom appear to be clinical researchers; your second is about a tenured researcher being briefly blocked from Twitter for expressing opinions rather than stating facts and your third is an apparently completely unrelated lecture by Slavoj Žižek. We have a whole bunch of observational studies on the effects of hormone treatment. There are a bunch more registered that we're waiting for results on. You haven't shown me any evidence suggesting that hormone treatment does more harm than good, nor any evidence that research is being suppressed.