3 ms·
After another read of your post: You seem to argue a totally different point. I did NOT say Tesla was not liable if their AP causes a crash in a fully self-driv
by sabertoothed 7y ago
After another read of your post: You seem to argue a totally different point. I did NOT say Tesla was not liable if their AP causes a crash in a fully self-driving mode. They are. My point in the original post was a different one.
- defterGoose 7y agoIt seems from your original comment and your reply that you're arguing that liability can be discharged if the AP system has fewer crashes per capital than humans do. You can't argue relative liability based on statistics. That's like me murdering someone and then arguing that I'm not liable because it just so happens that I didn't increase the per capita murder rate over last year. Now, whether Tesla has any claim that their liability can be discharged because the operator wasn't following legally binding instructions not to operate in that way is a different issue, and one I'm not privy to.
- sabertoothed 7y agoYeah, I was not arguing about liability. That's the misunderstanding. I was not concerned with liability. And you're completely right wrt liability.