3 ms·
I'm not sure there was any implication of "poor" by the OP. It seems you added that to drum up validation for your following healthcare argument. Rural does no
by s_y_n_t_a_x 7y ago
I'm not sure there was any implication of "poor" by the OP. It seems you added that to drum up validation for your following healthcare argument.
Rural does not equal poor. Most people I know around here have healthcare through their employer and are against more government involvement. They just want to keep their current plan and doctor.
I vote Republican because of economic and defense issues. I do lean more liberal when it comes to social issues. Libertarian if you have to put a label on it. Basically the government should just be for defense and limited regulation. States should handle the rest. Liberals always try to blanket the country in their policies.
It's sad to see Californians flock to Texas to avoid the taxes they voted for.
Republican policies may not help the poor, but Democrat policies create the poor.
- ncmncm 7y agoI see that you have forgotten on whose watch the Great Recession started, and on whose it ended. I see that you have forgotten who was responsible for the invasion of Iraq, which has now cost over 5 trillion dollars, and was justified with out-and-out fraud. So, on both economic and defense grounds, you vote against your own interest. Propaganda displaces truth.