4 ms·
a.) The cost to get these adverts looking better than terrible flash games would be pretty huge, and very difficult to automate. b.) The impact would be one of
by corin_ 16y ago
a.) The cost to get these adverts looking better than terrible flash games would be pretty huge, and very difficult to automate.
b.) The impact would be one of novelty, viewers wouldn't pay any attention to what the advert was trying to sell.
c.) Why bother, advertising is already able to sell products without placing the viewer inside the advertisements
- ThomPete 16y agoWow, you probably couldn't be more wrong. a.) It's trivial to make it look good in fact it have been for quite some time. b.) The impact is normally pretty big exactly because people pay attention once their friends or themselves are involved. c.) Advertising as you seem to refer to it doesn't work nearly as well. Why do you think adwords work? They work because they communicate better by being closer to what you care about. I shall see if I can make a list of examples but there is tons of great great examples looking stunning and having a huge impact.