3 ms·
So, there is no need to assume otherwise at this point. They are working through the legal system, and haven't named anyone. That's why you don't see any evide
by jasonlotito 7y ago
So, there is no need to assume otherwise at this point. They are working through the legal system, and haven't named anyone. That's why you don't see any evidence presented, or names, or anything else like that.
- j4kp07 7y ago> They are working through the legal system... That would be the "civil" legal system. I would imagine that if a police report was filed, the author would have mentioned that in the article. Otherwise, I treat it all as hyperbole whereby the author seems to be on the receiving end of the same rumors s/he has enabled.