5 ms·
That was my takeaway - she's doing to him exactly what he allowed other people to do to her. He's finding that he doesn't like it.
by commandlinefan 7y ago
That was my takeaway - she's doing to him exactly what he allowed other people to do to her. He's finding that he doesn't like it.
- jasonlotito 7y agoHe's handling this without naming anyone publicly, and going through proper channels. She did the exact opposite, making this public and threatening him enough that he felt compelled to leave a conference where she was apparently harassing him. Not quite the same thing.
- srpguy 7y agoDid we read the same article? He turned her speaker position down because of her pattern of vengeful, childlike behavior. She acted completely in line with what her reputation would suggest and pursued a personal harassment campaign. Maybe I'm missing something. Can you enumerate what he allowed people to do to her, and what she did to him? That way we can compare directly.
- NewTexasKubern 7y agoHe never said exactly why he turned her down.
- ndiscussion 7y ago> alleged pattern of vengeful, childlike behavior
- lawnchair_larry 7y agoThat isn’t mentioned anywhere in the linked article.
- mgkimsal 7y ago"she's doing to him exactly what he allowed other people to do to her" Please explain that. What did he 'allow' 'other people' to 'do' to her?
- revvx 7y agoThe conference organizer denied a speaker position in a conference. All that happened in private. The person and a third-party engaged (allegedly) in doxxing and public shaming. Even if the conference organizer was in the wrong, there's a world of difference between those two things.
- kazinator 7y agoPublic shaming using false allegations of stalking and harassment.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]