I wonder who is behind that article - the mention of lobbying against music group copyright extension seems a telling non-sequitior. It is irrelevant to the top

I wonder who is behind that article - the mention of lobbying against music group copyright extension seems a telling non-sequitior. It is irrelevant to the topic at hand yet they are upset enough to bring it up as they see it as something worthy of bashing. That isn't complaining about corporate influence but about who is winning essentially and sounds a lot like the agenda of angry old media that the world changed on them.