2 ms·
I very much disagree. Firstly, the name Google chose for its new pet language wasn't even unique, effectively stealing it from a Go! language, by my understand
by verisimilitudes 7y ago
I very much disagree. Firstly, the name Google chose for its new pet language wasn't even unique, effectively stealing it from a Go! language, by my understanding. With Google's track record, such as most recently attacking email, it's not surprising that Google would do this.
In any case, Google doesn't make the rules or set the stage. Gopher isn't dead and I have a Gopher hole. It's also my first thought that perhaps I'd stumbled on an interesting article, only to find it's more drivel about Google's shitty language.
In case you're wondering, here's the page where I debut my Gopher hole and the software I wrote to implement this:
http://verisimilitudes.net/2019-03-30 http://verisimilitudes.net/2019-03-30
- sagichmal 7y ago> Gopher isn't dead Any definition of "dead" which permits "Gopher isn't dead" would also permit "UUCP isn't dead", or "HTTP/1.0 isn't dead", or "Token ring isn't dead". Technically true, practically false.