4 ms·
This is a very obvious argument for privatization of any industry, but check out my response in this same comment thread. Consumers OBVIOUSLY have skin in the g
by swivelmaster 7y ago
This is a very obvious argument for privatization of any industry, but check out my response in this same comment thread. Consumers OBVIOUSLY have skin in the game, but asking a consumer to figure out which charter schools are great and which are frauds and which are merely mediocre requires far more research than the average parent has time to do. The incentive for a charter school to misrepresent its achievements is very high, and once a parent has committed to putting their child in that school, the cost of moving them to another if/when they discover problems is very high. By that point, the charter school will have already taken the voucher funding and can use it to advertise to the next sucker.
- coredog64 7y agoAFAICT, a public school has the same incentives and has even higher switching costs (approximately 6% of the value of your house, whatever transaction fees your local government tacks on, plus whatever it costs to pack up and move).
- swivelmaster 7y agoCharter schools can be for-profit enterprises, or can be structured in such a way that executives can make a lot of money (even if they are technically non-profits). This is what skews the incentives for charter schools versus public schools.