5 ms·
And, indeed, what studies are available seem to confirm this. Not just for private schools - charter schools also tend to underperform the public schools. Gran
by bunderbunder 7y ago
And, indeed, what studies are available seem to confirm this. Not just for private schools - charter schools also tend to underperform the public schools.
Granted, kids who go to them do tend to get better test scores, go to better universities, have more successful careers, etc. But that's because the whole education industry is a massive exercise in selection bias. The most careful studies I've seen, though, seem to indicate that, all other factors being equal, a typical kid is going to learn more in public school than in private or charter school.
This rather mirrors my own experience. I did 2 years of public high school, and 2 years of college prep. I can say that it's absolutely true that my classmates were generally smarter and more studious in the prep school. But the prep school was also easy. It really didn't particularly matter how much effort I put into my homework. As long as I didn't blatantly blow it off, my teachers would dutifully send my parents a report card full of the As and Bs they were paying for.
By contrast, it was the public schools where I had the teachers who'd keep ratcheting up their expectations until they could sense that I was actually working to try and get good grades on my papers.
- hakfoo 7y agoIn terms of actual student performance (as opposed to grades), I'd expect parents to be a major factor. They're going to build support networks-- running the fundraisers, supporting extracurriculars, keeping an eye on student performance and scandals. When we provide "options" -- charters, private schooling, even public magnets-- the parents who are motivated and concerned enough to build those networks tend to pounce on them. The "default" public school loses its champions and ends up producing worse outcomes for everyone whose parents aren't tuned in.