Your analogy is flawed. Comparing a service given "freely" in exchange for some other non-monetary consideration to a service paid for. If you pay, there is exp

Your analogy is flawed. Comparing a service given "freely" in exchange for some other non-monetary consideration to a service paid for. If you pay, there is expectation that that payment is totally of the exchange. If it's exchange for some other consideration (no idea why, but people think it really is free, it's not it's just not priced in money), there should be expectation that there is some other exchange. A better comparison would be "tv studio audience" you get seat/place to watch show live in exchange they get to use your voice and probably image. Same at sporting event. There probably even is an agreement outlining this exchange. There is also on websites, just no body reads them.