> The difference is it's (often) incredibly obvious that a building isn't safe the moment you step into it. This is just not true. If anything, our "danger det

> The difference is it's (often) incredibly obvious that a building isn't safe the moment you step into it. This is just not true. If anything, our "danger detectors" probably give off an equal amount of false positives and false negatives when judging the structural integrity of objects we're unfamiliar with. And the same holds true for code bases, which is exactly why it makes sense to hold software to a similar standard as physical engineering.