> haven't looked up her bio as that would be creepy eh? how would it be creepy? honestly, your comment is creepy. i did look her up (not independently, but in

> haven't looked up her bio as that would be creepy eh? how would it be creepy? honestly, your comment is creepy. i did look her up (not independently, but inspired by your strange reticence), and what i found odd -- but shouldn't have -- is that the banner photo on the article isn't her. it's just a completely unrelated stock photo. that's interesting because the article is a self-pr SEO type piece, not a dispassionate generic "industry observer" piece or other type of actual analysis. it's the type of article that would actually benefit from an actual photo of the author.