4 ms·
I actually really like systemd's service files, and the functionality it provides. I like the ability to express dependencies clearly, the fine-grained control
by nrclark 7y ago
I actually really like systemd's service files, and the functionality it provides. I like the ability to express dependencies clearly, the fine-grained control over server restart behavior, and a ton of other systemd features. I'm also very happy to see it replace cron.
What I _do not_ like are:
- systemd-resolved
- systemd-networkd
- systemd taking over disk mounts
- systemctl
- unit files spread out all over the place
- mandatory journald
- mandatory dbus
- only works on Linux
- pushing the BSDs farther towards being obsolete
I'm very glad to see sysv-init on the way out, personally. I think systemd unit files are a huge improvement, and greatly improve standardization and init quality. But that doesn't intrinsically mean that the systemd project is doing the right thing.
- rzzzt 7y agoIs there an alternative init implementation that is compatible with systemd unit files?
- JdeBP 7y agoThere are certainly automated tools for converting systemd unit files into the service definitions used by other systems. * http://jdebp.uk./Softwares/nosh/worked-example.html http://jdebp.uk./Softwares/nosh/worked-example.html * http://jdebp.uk./Softwares/nosh/guide/converting-systemd-units.html http://jdebp.uk./Softwares/nosh/guide/converting-systemd-uni... * http://jdebp.uk./Softwares/nosh/guide/commands/convert-systemd-units.xml http://jdebp.uk./Softwares/nosh/guide/commands/convert-syste...