3 ms·
I have many BT devices, from budget to high-end, and they all have problems, from minor to major. I stress "from minor to major"; in my experience BT does ulti
by pizza234 7y ago
I have many BT devices, from budget to high-end, and they all have problems, from minor to major.
I stress "from minor to major"; in my experience BT does ultimately work, but there are always minor, odd, kinks like (I assume) an Android update preventing my headhphones to establish a "media" connection 50%+ of the time.
Given that also my high-end devices are subject to problems (eg. ~400$ mobile phone with ~400$ headphones), then the specification may be technically correct but practically unusable.
To me, "practically unusable" == "broken".
- moron4hire 7y agoHaving implemented a few devices, honestly, the spec couldn't be more straight forward. It's really a case of hardware engineers being terrible at user experience. Just because a device is expensive doesn't mean the company has put all necessary effort into the BT stack. Look at how many "simple" things Apple, Google, and Facebook screw up on a daily basis.