8 ms·
I guess they do not realise what is coming? > '...one of the ways that people can improve their own social credit score is to report on the supposed misdeeds o
by Gys 7y ago
I guess they do not realise what is coming?
> '...one of the ways that people can improve their own social credit score is to report on the supposed misdeeds of others.'
- johnchristopher 7y agoNow, that's Orwellian. As described in the book. It's not the cameras, the government agents in the shadows or the spying technology... It's the end result of everyone spying on each other that made the world of 1984 so inescapable to Winston.
- arethuza 7y agoFrom what I remember of 1984 I don't think everyone was spied on all the time - it was mainly the Outer Party members (~13% of the population) who were scrutinized so closely as they were the source of potential threats to the Inner Party. Most of the characters in the book, apart from O'Brien, were Outer Party members.
- dsfyu404ed 7y agoThe proles were relatively free to do whatever but they were too poor to do much of anything which is why they were left free. That said, the real life 1984 that we see slowly emerging in a piecemeal manner worldwide (faster in some places than in others) seems to mostly effect the lower and middle classes.
- chupasaurus 7y agoWell, everyone would have a telescreen in their pocket. China has a big surveillance playground in Xinjiang region (paywalled: https://www.wsj.com/articles/twelve-days-in-xinjiang-how-chinas-surveillance-state-overwhelms-daily-life-1513700355 https://www.wsj.com/articles/twelve-days-in-xinjiang-how-chi...), including random microphone recordings.
- cyphar 7y agoI would argue the key aspect of something being Orwellian is the redefinition of language such that arguments against the government's position cannot be made anymore. The idea of people being spied on by their neighbours in 1984 comes from real-world examples that Orwell was drawing on at the time (the Hitler Youth and the purges under Stalin). While it is very dystopian, I would classify it as being extreme totalitarianism and not Orwellian. Almost all recent totalitarian regimes I can think of had people informing on their neighbours.
- johnchristopher 7y agoYou are absolutely right. I can't edit to correct myself. The redefinition of language is more `Orwellian` than the all-spying. My point is that the spying in 1984 is most of the time seen as being done by Big Brother and its agents against the people but it was quite clear to me when reading it that it was more about everyone keeping an eye on everyone to report to BB, people were doing the watching and there was no escape (I seem to remember there's a line about how they don't know if the camera work but that doesn't matter because you can't prove it and people could be spied on by anyone anyway). Maybe it's time I pick it up again.
- dsfyu404ed 7y agoI would say that having people feel that it is acceptable to inform on their neighbors is a key element of a proper totalitarian society. This is why I routinely go off on people when they suggest calling the cops (or some other external authority) over petty differences. I don't want to see that kind of behavior left unchallenged let alone normalized.
- gerbilly 7y agoYou don't have to go to a book of fiction to get an example. Some Chinese are still old enough to remember the Cultural revolution. During this time people were interrogated for days by their peers in so called 'struggle meetings' in an attempt to change their supposed incorrect behaviour. Reporting someone as a bourgeois person could cause them to disappear.
- ImaCake 7y agoThe soviet satellite republics strike me as another real world 1984 dystopia. You can watch whole movies about the terrifyingly real East German Stasi.
- icebraining 7y agoIn the novel itself, Ingsoc is said to be similar to the CPSU. Orwell was drawing direct inspiration from the USSR under Stalin, as well as from other real world events.
- sgift 7y agoThe Securitate (The secret service of Romania) would be another equally terrifying example.
- sgift 7y agoPeople are easily manipulated. You only need the right incentives and tricks. As long as they are convinced or can be convinced that only bad people will be prosecuted (they are good people after all, right?) many people will welcome this. Reminder: Why do you need privacy if you have nothing to hide?
- dsfyu404ed 7y ago>As long as they are convinced or can be convinced that only bad people will be prosecuted (they are good people after all, right?) many people will welcome this. Everyone is the hero of their own story.
- shaobo 7y agoDoes NY Post have a source/reference for this?