4 ms·
I think part of the allure of private chats is that it's you & a small group of people who actually know each other - having a free-for-all and just splitting r
by jacobedawson 7y ago
I think part of the allure of private chats is that it's you & a small group of people who actually know each other - having a free-for-all and just splitting rooms up doesn't engender a feeling of togetherness any more than going to a random gathering of people with a single 'banner' topic. Twitter almost has the hashtag thing down.
Human social groups have a purported manageable upper limit of around 150 people, so super mass networks like insta, facebook, twitter etc also get to 'broadcast' level interactions rather than intimate discussions - it seems as though private group chats are a way to have a digital campfire, with less pressure & more shared experience.
There's so much behind building a social network that it takes a perfect mix of luck, timing, skill & marketing. But they will continue to come, won't they.
- kalado 7y agoOh I agree. But I see this as an opportunity where you would split of the main chats by creating a more obscure named chat. Like you have a nice conversation with a few people and you can send them a private message "hey, lets continue this in #got-indepth" and then you invite others that you like. You can have general conversations with a lot of people and break up into like minded groups naturally. Moderation is a problem I don't know how to approach. Being able to ban people on a majority vote could be alienating.
- asdff 7y agoGroupme is big for this at my university.