> Why, because Microsoft moved their German headquarters Munich - not for any business reasons - but for secret nefarious reasons. Here is where you are misint

> Why, because Microsoft moved their German headquarters Munich - not for any business reasons - but for secret nefarious reasons. Here is where you are misinterpreting all of the above. I did not say there were any "secret nefarious reasons". All involved parties made the decision that would be most beneficial to them ("business reasons" in the case of Microsoft), which influenced Munich's reversal. Munich's switch to LiMux was an embarrassment to Microsoft, and one of the reasons for their move to Munich was to gain political clout by becoming a more important stakeholder to Munich. Generally speaking, companies have more influence on a city's decisions when they are actually located in the city, because they pay taxes to the city and have more employees living there. This isn't a "conspiracy theory", it's common sense. In summary: You: Munich switched back to Windows solely because there were issues with the LiMux deployment, and Windows software is superior to Linux software. Me: Munich switched back to Windows because there were issues with the LiMux deployment, and because Microsoft made itself more important to Munich by moving its headquarters to the city. We can agree to disagree.