>The author's bias is obvious. She's not even trying to create an impression of objectivity. The activists and this article's author are congratulating each oth

>The author's bias is obvious. She's not even trying to create an impression of objectivity. The activists and this article's author are congratulating each other all over Twitter. The irony is that actually printing someone taking the appellation "entitled vocal majority" makes them look bad, not the company. Disclaimer: I do not work for Google, but I'm pre-inclined to favor the employees doing more or less whatever they want, but holy hell, what a way for an activist minority to alienate itself from the base you need to form a union or cooperative.