2 ms·
I don’t know if that’s really the case, given https://docs.google.com/document/d/11yHom20CrsuX8KQJXBBw04s80Unjv8zCg_A7sPAX_9Y https://docs.google.com/document/d
by akerl_ 7y ago
I don’t know if that’s really the case, given https://docs.google.com/document/d/11yHom20CrsuX8KQJXBBw04s80Unjv8zCg_A7sPAX_9Y https://docs.google.com/document/d/11yHom20CrsuX8KQJXBBw04s8...
> Goals
> * The option to encrypt to SSH keys, with built-in GitHub .keys support
And lower on the page, it shows the use of built-in command-line syntax for “github:$recipientname”.
It definitely works for keys that aren’t used for SSH, but support for SSH keys seems to be a large part of the rational for the ed25519 support (otherwise it would just be a tool that operated on X25519 keys directly).
- tptacek 7y agoThat's true, I'm just saying, the rationale for the existence of the tool isn't "build something that encrypts with SSH keys", but rather, "build a modern replacement for PGP file encryption".