3 ms·
It's a bit anachronistic to compare Lisp's goals from 40 years ago to current JS situation. The latter we're stuck with for political reasons, while the former
by debug-desperado 7y ago
It's a bit anachronistic to compare Lisp's goals from 40 years ago to current JS situation. The latter we're stuck with for political reasons, while the former really did need to overcome hardware limitations to be successful in that era.
Also with Typescript being adopted by most major JS projects, I wouldn't say that dynamic typing "won."