Not clear there's any intent to censor here by the courts, so much as mediate a dispute between two equally disreputable vendors of bogus lie detection systems.

Not clear there's any intent to censor here by the courts, so much as mediate a dispute between two equally disreputable vendors of bogus lie detection systems. More concerning is the fact that so many large law enforcement institutions continue to use these systems even after the fact of their ineffectiveness has been established beyond a reasonable doubt. If such institutions cannot weigh and respond to evidence correctly as it relates to their own investigatory methods, why should we have any faith in their ability to handle evidence correctly in the course of those investigations themselves?